Home Resident Planning Applications (Resident) Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Pursuant to the Council’s published Scheme of Delegation, the applications set out in the Delegated List below are now the subject of a recommendation by a Planning Officer. Applicants and agents who have any queries regarding a recommendation contained on this list should contact the planning officer dealing with the application. Please note that a Councillor can request that an application is removed from the Delegated List and referred to the Planning and Regulatory Services Committee at any stage prior to 5pm on the date noted in the table below provided a sound planning reason is given.

ALL CALL IN REQUESTS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO EMAIL ADDRESS .   ALL REQUESTS SHOULD BE TITLED ‘CALL IN REQUEST’

The new IT System for Planning went live on 5th December 2022. Applicants, agents – and any third parties who may have an interest in a particular application –  are asked to note that under the new IT System the functionality of the system has changed and language/terminology used on the system is different to that used under the old system.  In particular, it should be noted that unlike the old IT system, the status of an application on the new IT system will no longer change when the application has been placed on a delegated list.  Therefore, the onus is on applicants, agents and any third parties who may have an interest in a particular application to check the weekly delegated lists which appear on the Council’s website every Thursday evening to determine if an application has been placed on the delegated list at www.armaghbanbridgecraigavon.gov.uk/resident/planning-applications-residents/

Members of the public should also note there are a number of identified technical issues with the new system.  The performance of the system will continue  to be monitored as part of the normal service management arrangements and the Council is working closely with the stakeholders including the suppliers to resolve the outstanding issues.  Any issues of concern regarding the new planning IT system should be forwarded to

Lists of delegated planning applications can be viewed in the table below.

  • You can use the search box below to find an application, try searching by: Application number, postcode or first line of address.
  • If the green “+” icon is visible click on it to reveal hidden columns.

Reference NumberLocationProposalAgent Name & AddressApplicant Name & AddressRecommendationReason for Refusal (Where applicable)Date Delegate List IssuedDeadline for Call in (applies to elected members only) 5pm on
LA08/2024/0100/OLands approx. 110m West of 52 Drumanphy Road, PortadownSite for a one-and-a half storey farm dwelling with new access and associated landscaping & site worksManor Architects 30A High Street
Moneymore
BT45 7PD
Cathal Cullen 12 Eglish Park
Annaghmore
Portadown
BT62 1NW
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policies CTY 1 and CTY 10 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside and does not merit being considered as an exceptional case in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed new dwelling is visually linked (or sited to cluster) with an established group of buildings on the farm.
3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed dwelling is not visually linked or sited to cluster with an established group of buildings on the farm and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in ribbon development along Drumanphy Road.
5. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the dwelling would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would, if permitted add to a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0400/FLands 40m to the north of No.48 Drumnagoon Road and 50m to the north of No.50 Drumnagoon Road, Portadown, BT63 5REProposed housing development of 48 no. dwellings (to include 34 No. semi-detached units, 4 No. townhouses & 2 No. apartment buildings to provide 10 No. units), including associated site works, road layout, car parking and landscaping works.Doherty Architectural Services
37 Wynchurch Avenue
Belfast
BT6 0JP
Windsor Developments Ltd
6 Saintfield Road
Lisburn
BT27 5BD
Approval (Objections received)19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0161/OLands adjacent to and west of, 67 Battlehill Road, Portadown BT62 4ES & approximately 29m north west of 69 Battlehill Road, Portadown BT62 4ESSite for dwelling and garage.Amelia Comiskey Tattygar
Castlebleany
Co. Monaghan
A75 DX54
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 2a of Planning Policy Statement 21, New Dwellings in Existing Clusters, in that the there is no cluster than appears as a visual entity in the local landscape, the proposal is not bounded on at least two sides with other development and the proposal cannot be absorbed in an existing cluster through rounding off and consolidation and it would alter the existing character of the rural area.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the extension of the ribbon development along Battlehill Road.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, in that the site is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
5. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of PPS 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed dwelling would result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0379/FOpposite and 70 metres south-west of 21 Oakhill Road, Dromore, BT25 1PFErection of off-site replacement dwelling and detached garage, retention of existing dwelling as domestic store and associated site worksPepper Architects 48 Kinallen Road
Kinallen
Dromara
BT25 2NW
Andrew Sleator 21 Oakhill Road
Dromore
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 3 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that: the proposed dwelling is not located within the curtilage of the original dwelling and it has not been demonstrated that the proposed alternative dwelling position brings demonstrable benefits; the proposed two storey dwelling at this location would have a visual impact significantly greater than the existing building; a two storey design at this location is not appropriate as it would be unduly prominent in the landscape.
3. The proposal is contrary to The Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that a proposed two storey dwelling at this location would be considered a prominent feature in the landscape, the site lacks established boundaries required to provide a suitable degree of enclosure and a two storey dwelling design at the site and locality would be not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape due to the lack of sufficient natural features or backdrop.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement (SPPS) and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that a two storey dwelling at the proposed location would, if permitted result in an unduly prominent feature in the landscape and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0585/O Lands immediately north- west of No 3 and 45 metres south-east of 5 Whitegate Road, Rathfriland, BT34 5NNSite for infill dwelling and garageMarcus Bingham Architectural Design Services NI 9 Tullyquilly Road
Rathfriland
Newry
BT34 5LR
Allison Wilson 29/31 Greenhill Road
Drumgreenagh
Rathfriland
Newry
BT34 5AS
Approval (Objections received)19/09/202426/09/2024
La08/2024/0654/F15 Elizabeth Terrace, Portadown Craigavon, BT63 5RLErection of single storey rear/side extensionMarc Ballard, Reality Architects, 16 DEMESNE PARK
HOLYWOOD
Ruth Aston, 15 Elizabeth Terrace
Portadown
BT63 5RL
Approval (Objections received)19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0405/WPT51a Hill Street
Milford
Armagh
BT60 3NZ
End weight reduction to a beech tree protected by TPO (removal of 5.0 metres of branch)Robert Agnew
29 Goland Road
Armagh
BT60 3PS
Approval (Objections received)19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0438/OLands approx. 15 metres north of 19 Lisraw Road
Scarva
BT63 6LJ
Site for a dwelling (infill development) with associated site worksNI Planning Permission Ltd
Scottish Provident Building
7 Donegall Square West
Belfast
BT1 6JH
Damian Murphy
19 Lisraw Road
BT63 6LJ
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the application site does not constitute a small gap within an otherwise substantial and continuously built up frontage.

3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed development would, if permitted, result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings, and it does not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in the area, and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.

4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, and Policies NH 2 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2: Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would not result in the unacceptable adverse impact on or damage to any protected species or priority habitats.
19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2023/3118/OLands between No.38 and No. 45 School Road, Ballyroney, Banbridge, BT32 5JFSite for dwelling and domestic garageCollins & Collins, 11 Marcus Street
Newry
BT34 1ET
Mrs Lucinda Granger, 71 Blaney Road
Altnamackan
Newtownhamilton
BT35 0EA
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the application site does not respect the existing development pattern along the frontage in terms of siting.

3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed development does not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in the area and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.

4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, and Policies NH 2 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2: Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would not result in the unacceptable adverse impact on or damage to any protected species or priority habitats.

5. The proposed development is contrary to paragraphs 4.11, 4.12 and 5.72 of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement on the grounds that it would fail to provide an acceptable living environment for prospective residents.
19/09/202426/09/2024
LA08/2024/0062/OAdjacent to and Directly West of 15 Springhill Road, Glenanne Co Armagh, BT60 2LFSite for dwelling and garage - Infill siteIan Lenaghan Lenaghan Design 30 Moss Park
Richhill, Armagh
BT61 9PT
Philomena McComb 15 Springhill Road
Glenanne Co. Armagh
BT60 2LF
Approval (Objections received)12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2023/2597/FUPU Industries Ltd, 1 Quillyburn Business Park, Dromore, BT25 1BYRetention of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant powered by mains fed natural gas, adjacent to north east end elevation of existing factory. The CHP plant includes the following components, the CHP Boiler unit, a 10m high stainless steel flue, 10,000 litre water storage buffer tank and concrete base.Gordon McKnight Partnership
31 Shore Road
Holywood
BT18 9HX
UPU Industries Ltd
1 Quillyburn Business Park
Banbridge Road
Dromore
BT25 1BY
Approval (Objections received)12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2023/2062/F53m NW of 165 Derrylee Road, Dungannon, Armagh, BT71 6NU - replacing No. 163 Derrylee Road, Dungannon Erection of replacement dwelling, existing dwelling to be retained as ancillary domestic storeAustin Mullan CMI Planners Ltd 38b Airfield Road
Toomebridge
Co. Antrim
BT41 3SG
Thomas Dilly 161 Derrylee Road
Dungannon
BT71 8NU
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 3 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that a storey and a half dwelling at this location would have a visual impact significantly greater than the existing building and would appear unduly prominent in the landscape.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Derrylee Road and would not respect the existing pattern of development in terms of plot size.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that a storey and a half dwelling at this location would be considered a prominent feature in the landscape, the site lacks established boundaries required to provide a suitable degree of enclosure and the design of the building is inappropriate for the site and locality and would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape due to the lack of sufficient natural features or backdrop.
5. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that a storey and a half dwelling at the proposed location would, if permitted result in an unduly prominent feature in the landscape and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside. A dwelling on this restricted site would not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in the area.
12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2024/0132/FLands 45m South-East of 34 Drumcullen Road, Dungannon, BT71 7JGExtension of existing dwelling curtilage and erection of domestic horse stablesStephen Hughes NI Planning Consultants
45b Magherarville Road
Armagh
BT60 3PP
Gary Traynor 34 Drumcullen Road
Blackwatertown
Armagh
BT71 7JG
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposed building is contrary to the SPPS and Policy EXT1 of Planning Policy Statement 7 (Addendum), Residential Extensions and Alterations, as the proposal lies outside the domestic curtilage of the existing dwelling known as 34 Drumcullen Road, the proposed siting and ancillary works are, not considered sympathetic to the appearance of the main dwelling, and if permitted it would result in development that is detrimental to the character of the local area.
3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the ancillary works proposed would be out of character and would result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the ancillary works proposed would not integrate with their surroundings
12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2022/1141/F2 Monaghan Road
Armagh
BT60 4DA
Extension of existing car park to include proposed 600mm x 600mm mono unleaded fuel pump, proposed 10,000L underground unleaded fuel tank double skinned and proposed 10,000L underground interceptor. Proposal to include the provision of 14 additional car parking spaces with 1 metre high retaining wall to boundary. 150 x 380mm deep enviro channel with 6mm heel friendly slot to boundary (x2), reinforced concrete tanker stand 5m X 18m with connection of new storm drainage line into existing, 9no. bollards and new double gate access for fuel delivery. 13no. proposed LED column mounted floodlights to parking, fuel filling and circulation areas. Also relocation of existing traffic island and tactile paving along the Keady Road entrance.Whittaker & Watt Architects
379 Antrim Road
Newtownabbey
BT36 5EB
Stephen Mullan
2 Monaghan Road
Armagh
BT60 4DA
Approval (Objections received)12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2023/2997/OSite for dwelling adjacent and North of 26 Cherryville Road, PortadownSite for infill dwellingJames Austin 100 Ardmore Road
Craigavon
BT66 QJP
Mr & Mrs P O'Brien C/O 29 Cherryville Rd,
Portadown,
BT62 1RW
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the application site does not constitute a small gap within an otherwise substantial and continuously built up frontage, and that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Cherryville Road.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed site lacks long established natural boundaries and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the building to integrate into the landscape, and the proposed building relies primarily on the use of new landscaping for integration, and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed development would, if permitted, be unduly prominent in the landscape, result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings, not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in that area, and create a ribbon of development, and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
5. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy NH 1 of PPS 2: Natural Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is not likely to have a significant effect on a European designated site.
6. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy NH 5 of PPS 2: Natural Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is not likely to result in the unacceptable adverse impact on priority habitats and the water environment.
12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2024/0114/FCraigavon Senior High School, 26 - 34 Lurgan Road, Portadown, BT63 5HJErection of two triple modular units to provide in total six 60m2 general classroom, six 6m2 classroom stores, pupil toilet facilities and ancillary accommodationNigel McGarry Education Authority 3 Charlemont Place
The Mall
Armagh
BT61 9AX
Nigel McGarry Education Authority 3 Charlemont Place
The Mall
Armagh
BT61 9AX
Approval (Objections received)12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2024/0637/OSite between 1 and 5 Ballynaris Lane, Dromore, BT25 1JASite for 2no. infill dwellings with detached garagesRory Pepper Pepper Architects 48 kinallen rd
Kinallen
Dromara
BT25 2NW
Ann Wilson 41 Gregorlough Road
Dromore
BT25 1RR
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the application site does not constiute a small gap sufficent only to accommodate up to a maximum of two houses within an otherwise substantial and continuously built up frontage and the proposed plot size would not respect the exisitng development pattern along the frontage. 12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2024/0505/ANo.53 Bridge Street (gable elevation) Banbridge. BT32 3JLErection of 1 Digital Screen advertisement to be mounted on gable wall to replace two existing 48 sheet advertisement hoardingsClear Channel NI LTD Unit 2 Ashbank
Queens Road
Belfast
BT3 9DT
Clear Channel NI LTD Unit 2 Ashbank
Queens Road
Belfast
BT3 9DT
Refusal1. The proposed advertisement is contrary to Policy Ad 1 of PPS 17 in that if approved would have an adverse impact on amenity when viewed in the context of the area in particular the setting of listed buildings.12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2024/0585/O Lands immediately north- west of No 3 and 45 metres south-east of 5 Whitegate Road, Rathfriland, BT34 5NSite for infill dwelling and garageMarcus Bingham Architectural Design Services NI 9 Tullyquilly Road
Rathfriland
Newry
BT34 5LR
Allison Wilson 29/31 Greenhill Road
Drumgreenagh
Rathfriland
Newry
BT34 5AS
Approval (Objections received)12/09/202419/09/2024
LA08/2022/0594/FLakeview Park
Ballygassey Road
Loughgall
BT61 8HU
Proposed alterations to existing football stadium with works to include demolition of existing home stand and erection of replacement stand to provide 336 seats, erection of away stand to provide 270 seats, erection of new home turnstiles, away turnstiles and toilets, change of surface to football pitch from grass to 3G and associated services and landscape works (amended description))da architects ltd Unit 6 Armagh Business Park
Hamiltonsbawn Road
Armagh
BT60 1HW
Loughgall Football Club Lakeview Park
Ballygasy Road
Loughgall
BT61 8HU
Approval (Objections received)05/09/202412/09/2024
LA08/2024/0005/OLands immediately adjacent and north west of 36 Ballynagarrick Road, Portadown BT63 5NRSite for dwelling and garageGlyn Owen, The Designworks Studio, 21 Annagora Road
Portadown
BT62 4JE
Margaret McCullough, 36 Ballynagarrick Road
Portadown
BT63 5NR
RefusalThe proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposal is not considered an exception to policy as it is not a small gap site within an otherwise substantial and continuously built up frontage and if permitted, the development would add to a ribbon of development along the Ballynagarrick Road. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the dwelling would, if permitted, result in a suburban style build-up of development, add to a ribbon of development, and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS 6.12 and to policy BH11 of Planning Policy Statement 6, Planning Archaeology and the Built Heritage, as the proposal would have an adverse impact on the listed building (HB14/05/003) at 36 Ballynagarrick Road Portadown. 05/09/202412/09/2024
LA08/2024/0109/F50m West of 49 Plantation Road Gilford BT63 5NH Erection of new office buildingMichelle Price, RPS, 74 Boucher Road
Belfast
BT12 6RZ
McAtee Recycling , 50m West of 49 Plantation Road
Gilford
BT63 5NH
Approval (Objections received)05/09/202412/09/2024
LA08/2024/0193/FSite north west and immediately adjacent to 25 Lowtown Road, Gilford Craigavon, BT63 6AP. Erection of dwelling and garage (in substitution of replacement dwelling granted under LA08/2021/1087/F). Foster McCavitt Architects Ltd, 6 Lurgan Road
Banbridge
Steve & Joyce Brownless, 174 Banbridge Road
Donaghcloney
BT66 7PL
Approval (Objections received)05/09/202412/09/2024
LA08/2023/2062/F53m NW of 165 Derrylee Road, Dungannon, Armagh, BT71 6NU - replacing No. 163 Derrylee Road, Dungannon (amended site address).Erection of replacement dwelling, existing dwelling to be retained as ancillary domestic storeAustin Mullan CMI Planners Ltd 38b Airfield Road
Toomebridge
Co. Antrim
BT41 3SG
Thomas Dilly 161 Derrylee Road
Dungannon
BT71 8NU
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 3 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that a storey and a half dwelling at this location would have a visual impact significantly greater than the existing building and would appear unduly prominent in the landscape.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that a storey and a half dwelling at this location would be considered a prominent feature in the landscape, the site lacks established boundaries required to provide a suitable degree of enclosure and the design of the building is inappropriate for the site and locality and would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape due to the lack of sufficient natural features or backdrop.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that a storey and a half dwelling at the proposed location would, if permitted result in an unduly prominent feature in the landscape and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside. A dwelling on this restricted site would not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in the area.
05/09/202412/09/2024
LA08/2024/0011/F100M NW OF 166A Ballymoney Rd, Banbridge BT32 4HWRetention of farm building with underground slurry tank, yard areas & associated siteworksFmK Architecture Ltd, Unit 5 Ahoghill Business Centre
58 Cullybackey Road
Ahoghill
Ballymena
BT42 1LA
S & K McDonell, 166A Ballymoney Road
Banbridge
BT32 4HW
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy CTY1 of PPS21: Sustainable Development in the Countrysdie in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location.
2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policies CTY1 and CTY12 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the development fails the CTY12 headnote policy test in that the site is not located on an active and established agricultural holding.
3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy NH1 of PPS2: Natural Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is not likely to have a significant effect on a European designated site.
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy NH5 of PPS2: Natural Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is not likely to result in the unacceptable adverse impact on priority habitats and the water environment.
05/09/202412/09/2024
LA08/2023/1756/FLands approximately 70m to the north east of 156 Navan Fort Road, Armagh, BT60 4PY and 100m to the north west of 153 Navan Fort Road, Armagh, BT60
4PY.
Proposed new access and associated lane way with associated site works & planting for JMW Farms and Greencircle Renewables. (amended proposal)Manor Architects Stable Buildings
30A High Street
Moneymore
BT45 7PD
JMW Farms Ltd 2 Kennedies Road
Killylea
BT60 4NQ
Approval (Objections received)29/08/202405/09/2024
LA08/2023/2832/FLands 100m immediately north of 129 Killylea Road, Armagh and 120m south west of 146 Navan Fort Road, BT60 4PYProposed service/ access/ private linkage road for a single undertaking to serve existing JMW Farms and Greencircle Renewable's, with, associated site works, accesses, control points, signage, drainage with junction connections linking Bracknagh and Navan Fort Roads.Manor Architects Stable Buildings
30A High Street
Moneymore
BT45 7PD
JMW Farms Ltd 2 Kennedies Road
Killylea
BT60 4NQ
Approval (Objections received)29/08/202405/09/2024
LA08/2024/0616/O20 metres west of 65 Derryraine Road, Collone, Armagh, BT60 1NASite for proposed infill dwelling Holmes & Doran 1st Floor The Old Savings Bank 1 Victoria Street ArmaghFiona Graham 63 Derryraine Road Collone Armagh BT60 1NARefusal1)The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2)The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposal is not located within a substantial and continuously built up frontage and if permitted, would create a ribbon of development along Derryraine Road.

3)The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the dwelling would, if permitted, result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and create a ribbon of development, and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.
29/08/202405/09/2024
LA08/2019/0400/F3 Pinley Green
Markethill
Co.Armagh
BT60 1RX
Change of use from dwelling house to house of multiple occupation.Trevor Woods 33 Killeen Road
Collone
Armagh
BT60 2AA
Mr Victor Foster 25 Springhill Road
Glenanne
Armagh
BT60 2LF
Approval (Objections received)29/08/202405/09/2024
LA08/2023/2169/F11 Mossvale Road, Dromore, including lands adjacent, and east to the rear of 15 Mossvale Road, Dromore, BT25 1DG.Proposed ‘Change of Use’ Planning Application to convert an existing small 180m2 vacant commercial light-industrial factory unit at 11 Mossvale Road, Dromore into a Pool Hall and Club complete with free access to the off-road car park behind 15 Mossvale Road, Dromore.DAVID ALLISON 22 BELSIZE ROAD
Lisburn
BT274BN
Dylan Woolsey 23 Primose Hill
Co. Down
Dromore
BT25 1FA
Approval (Objections received)29/08/202405/09/2024
LA08/2022/1364/O70m North East of 123 College Lands Road
Moy
Dungannon
BT71 6SW
Site for a dwelling and domestic garage (dwelling on a farm)CMI Planners Ltd
38b Airfield Road
The Creagh
Toomebridge
BT41 3SG
Mrs Mary Teresa McCabe
123 Collegelands Road
Moy
Dungannon
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, and Policy CTY 1 and Policy CTY 10 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, and does not merit being considered as an exceptional case in that it has not been demonstrated that: the farm business is currently active and has been established for at least 6 years; no other dwellings/development opportunities have been sold off from the farm holding within 10 years of the date of the application; and the proposed new building is not visually linked or sited to cluster with an established group of buildings on the farm
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed dwelling is visually linked or sited to cluster with an established group of buildings on the farm and would therefore not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
4. Having notified the applicant under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further details by way of a biodiversity checklist and associated ecological survey(s) are required to allow the Council to determine the planning application to ensure that the proposal meets with the requirements of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, and Policy NH 2 and Policy NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2: Natural Heritage and having not received this information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.
29/08/202405/09/2024
LA08/2023/2166/FImmediately to the rear (south-east) of 122 Battlehill Road
Armagh
BT61 8QJ
Erection of 4no. light industrial units (Class B2) with fencing to boundary, provision of car parking and associated site worksCDA-NI
4 Hartford Place
The Mall
Armagh
Rodney Williamson
143 Dobbin Road
Richhill
Armagh
BT61 9LW
Refusal1. Having notified the applicant under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further details by way of a transport assessment form and a noise impact assessment are required to allow the Council to determine the application to ensure the proposal meets with the requirements of the SPPS, Policies AMP 2 and AMP 7 of PPS 3, and Policies PED 1 and PED 9 of PPS 4, and having not received this information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.
2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy OS 1 of PPS 8, in that the development would, if permitted, result in the loss of an area of land which represents an area of open space.
3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS, Policies AMP 2 and AMP 7 of PPS 3, and Policy PED 9 of PPS 4, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal will not prejudice road safety or significantly inconvenience the flow of traffic, or provides adequate provision for car parking and appropriate servicing arrangements.
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy PED 9 of Planning Policy Statement 4: Planning and Economic Development, in that it has not been demonstrated that: it is compatible with surrounding land uses; it does not harm the amenities of nearby residents; it does not create a noise nuisance; the site layout and landscaping arrangements are of high quality and assist the promotion of sustainability and biodiversity; and appropriate boundary treatments are provided.
5. It has not been demonstrated that the proposal would not have an unacceptable adverse impact upon the residential amenity of nearby residents on the grounds of noise and for that reason it would be contrary to Paragraphs 4.11, 4.12 and 5.72 of the SPPS, and Policies PED 1 and PED 9 of PPS 4.
6. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS, and Policy CTY 1 of PPS 21, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
7. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY 15 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed development would mar the distinction between a settlement and the surrounding countryside.
29/08/202405/09/2024