Lists of delegated planning applications can be viewed in the table below.
- You can use the search box below to find an application, try searching by: Application number, postcode or first line of address.
- If the green “+” icon is visible click on it to reveal hidden columns.
| Reference Number | Location | Proposal | Agent Name & Address | Applicant Name & Address | Recommendation | Reason for Refusal (Where applicable) | Date Delegate List Issued | Deadline for Call in (applies to elected members only) 5pm on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA08/2020/1053/F | Adjacent and north east of Kernan Shops 77 Lurgan Road Portadown BT63 5QR | Retention of existing steelwork shed associated with the filling of oil fuel lorrys | ML Design & Management 11 Richmond Chase Mullavilly Tandragee BT62 2NP | Thompson Fuels Ltd 49 Market Street Tandragee | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy PED 1 of Planning Policy Statement 4, Planning and Economic Development in that the site of the development it is not located within an area specifically allocated for such purposes in a development plan nor that it is an existing or proposed industrial/employment area where it has been demonstrated that the proposal is compatible with the predominant industrial/employment use and has not been demonstrated that the proposal is determined to be acceptable on the basis of its own merits and it is not considered to be compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and PED 9 of Planning Policy Statement 4, Planning and Economic Development in that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that: - The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses; - The proposal will not harm the amenities of nearby residents; - The proposal does not create a noise nuisance; and - There are satisfactory measures to assist integration into the landscape. 3. The proposal is contrary to paragraphs 4.11 and 4.12 and Annex A of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement in that it has not been demonstrated that there would be no unacceptable adverse impacts on residential amenity by reason of noise, design, visual intrusion, loss of light and overshadowing and general nuisance. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2021/0138/F | Immediately South of Culowen Housing Scheme Benburb Street Blackwatertown BT71 7GA | Section 54 application for variation of Condition 8 of Planning Application LA08/2016/0451/F (housing development comprising 10 semi-detached dwellings and 4 maisonettes). Variation of condition 8 relates to maintenance and management of open space and amenity areas - submission of revised Landscape Management Plan. | Colm Donaghy Chartered Architect 43 Dungannon Street Moy BT71 7SH | P D Construction 30 Dungannon Road Moy BT71 7SW | Refusal | The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Planning Policy Statement 8 Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation (PPS 8) Policy OS 1, on the grounds that the proposed development would result in the loss of an area of existing open space and it has not been clearly shown that its redevelopment will bring substantial community benefits which decisively outweigh the loss of the open space. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2020/0018/F | Lands associated with and immediately to the rear (northeast) of 39 Derrymacash Road Lurgan BT66 6LG | Erection of garden store. | Paul McKernan, 25 Keady Road Armagh BT60 4AA | Mr Brendan Coleman, 39 Derrymacash Road Lurgan BT66 6LG | Approval (Objections received) | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2021/0123/O | Site between no.6 and no.12 Blackskull Road Dromore Down BT25 1JL | Site for proposed infill dwelling. | Pepper Architects 48 Kinallen Road Dromara Dromore BT25 2NW | Alistair Wilson 51 Blackskull Road Dromore BT25 1JN | Approval (Objections received) | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2021/0134/F | Approximately 20m South East of 6 Culowen Quay Blackwatertown BT71 7FP | Erection of dwelling (2 bed) | Colm Donaghy Chartered Architect 43 Dungannon Street Moy BT71 7SH | P D Construction 30 Dungannon Road Moy BT71 7SW | Refusal | 1.The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Planning Policy Statement 8 Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation (PPS 8) Policy OS 1, on the grounds that the proposed development would result in the loss of an area of existing open space and it has not been clearly shown that its redevelopment will bring substantial community benefits which decisively outweigh the loss of the open space. 2.The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy QD 1 (criteria a·& c) of Planning Policy Statement 7 (PPS 7): Quality Residential Environments and Criterion (b) of Policy LC 1 of the Addendum to PPS 7 Safeguarding the Character of Established Residential Areas, on the grounds that the proposed development fails to respect the surrounding context and the established pattern of development displayed in the surrounding area and would therefore be detrimental to the character and appearance of the general development. Adequate provision has not been provided for private open space as an integral part of the development. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2021/0123/O | Site between no.6 and no.12 Blackskull Road Dromore Down BT25 1JL | Site for proposed infill dwelling. | Pepper Architects, 48 Kinallen Road Dromara Dromore BT25 2NW | Alistair Wilson, 51 Blackskull Road Dromore BT25 1JN | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the site is not considered to be a small gap and would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Blackskull Road. 3. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the buildings would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings, would, if permitted not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in that area create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside. 4. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed site lacks long established natural boundaries and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the buildings to integrate into the landscape. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2020/0901/F | Lands 60m north and 100m north-east of 117 Drummanmore Road Armagh BT61 8RN | Conversion of existing farm buildings to shop / hire outlet with associated office and proposed erection of 6no. self catering studio units with rigid decking and associated site works. | Weir + Weir Architects Ltd Studio 5 Millennium Court William Street Portadown BT62 3NX | Mr M.J & J.R Scott 11 Annacramp Road Armagh BT61 8ES | Approval (Objections received) | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2020/1196/F | Outside 19 Market Street Lurgan Armagh BT66 6AR | The proposal is to site the TVM within the footway, in-line with existing street furniture and a minimum of 450mm from the kerb edge. The location and elevations are detailed on application drawings TL/PA01/ABC04, TL/PA01/ABC05 and TL/PA01/ABC06. The TVM has an associated shelter to protect customers using the device and an ancillary enclosure (feeder pillar) for provision of power, data communications and CCTV. The TVM requires fixing over a sound level base in the form of a poured concrete foundation. | Translink NI Ticketing, 22 Great Victoria Street Belfast BT2 7LX | Approval (Objections received) | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 | ||
| LA08/2019/0763/F | 50m south east of 102a Ballynamony Road Lurgan BT66 6LD | Erection of 1 No. dwelling and associated site works. (Revised Proposal). | Uel Weir 3 Church Street Portadown BT62 3EU | Marc Fegan 102a Ballynamoney Road Lurgan BT66 6LD | Approval (Objections received) | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2020/0192/F | Approximately 50 metres North West of 47 Ballymacanallen Road Gilford BT63 6AE | Erection of an infill dwelling, a garden shed and construction of a new entrance. | Paul Monaghan CA Ltd, 53 Malone Road Belfast BT9 6RY | Paul Monaghan CA Ltd, 53 Malone Road Belfast BT9 6RY | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy FLD 1 of Revised PPS15 as the development lies within the fluvial flood plain where development is not permitted and as the applicant has not demonstrated that the proposal constitutes an exception to the policy. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy FLD2 of PPS15 as a minimum 5m working strip has not been shown on the drawings along the watercourse to facilitate future maintenance by Rivers Agency. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2021/0073/O | Lands 85m south east of no. 44 Lower Castlevennon Road Katesbridge BT32 5QN | Proposed erection of infill dwelling and garage | 2Plan NI, 47 Lough Fea Road Cookstown BT80 9QL | Hugh Higgins, 44 Lower Castlevennon Road Katesbridge BT32 5QN | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Lower Castlevennon Road. 3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing and approved buildings and would, if permitted create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to further erode the rural character of the countryside. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2021/0046/O | Lands 35m south east of no. 44 Lower Castlevennon Road Katesbridge BT32 5QN | Proposed erection of infill dwelling and garage. | 2Plan NI, 47 Lough Fea Road Cookstown BT80 9QL | Mr Hugh Higgins, 44 Lower Castlevennon Road Katesbridge BT32 5QN | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Lower Castlevennon Road. 3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing and approved buildings and would, if permitted create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to further erode the rural character of the countryside. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2020/1539/O | 40m South East of no.5 Edenderry Road Scarva BT63 6NT | Proposed site for the erection of dwelling and garage in accordance with CTY8 of PPS21. | Sharon Johnston, 67b Plantation Road Portadown BT63 5NH | Mr & Mrs Richard Clements, 9 Edenderry Road Scarva BT63 6NT | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the addition of ribbon development along Edenderry Road. 3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would add to a ribbon of development and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside. 4. The proposal is contrary to Revised Planning Policy Statement 15 'Planning and Flood Risk' Policy FLD3 as it has not been demonstrated by way of a Drainage Assessment that adequate measures will be put in place to ensure that surface water runoff from the development will not adversely impact upon other development. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2020/1532/O | 50m North of no.9 Edenderry Road Scarva BT63 6NT | Proposed site for the erection of dwelling and garage in accordance with CTY8 of PPS21 | Sharon Johnston, 67b Plantation Road Portadown BT63 5NH | Mr & Mrs Richard Clements, 9 Edenderry Road Scarva BT63 6NT | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the addition of ribbon development along Edenderry Road. 3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would add to a ribbon of development and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside. 4. The proposal is contrary to Revised Planning Policy Statement 15 'Planning and Flood Risk' Policy FLD3 as it has not been demonstrated by way of a Drainage Assessment that adequate measures will be put in place to ensure that surface water runoff from the development will not adversely impact upon other development. | 10/06/2021 | 17/06/2021 |
| LA08/2020/0916/F | Between 29 and 31 Cranny Lane Portadown BT63 5SW | Proposed erection of 2no. dwellings with garages. | T.J Dreaning 135 Banbridge Road Donaghcloney BT66 7PJ | Mrs K & Mr R McMorran 25 Cranny Lane Portadown BT63 5SW | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement (SPPS) and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that while it is considered to be an exception as a small gap within a substantial and built up frontage, the proposal for two dwellings does not respect the existing development pattern along the frontage in terms of size, scale, siting and plot size. 3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposal for two dwellings and their garages would be suburban in character and inappropriate in this locality and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape. 4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that: the dwellings would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing and approved buildings and would not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in that area and would therefore result in a detrimental change to further erode the rural character of the countryside. | 03/06/2021 | 10/06/2021 |
| LA08/2020/0897/O | Adjacent to and west of 14 Uppertown Road Katesbridge Banbridge Down | Proposed site for infill dwelling. | H D Design, 3 Bannview Road Banbridge BT32 3RL | Seamus Curran, 30 Carrigart Craigavon | Approval (Objections received) | 03/06/2021 | 10/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2020/1060/O | Between numbers 15 and 19 Ballydugan Road Ballydugan Portadown BT63 5NL | Proposed 2no. dwellings on infill site in accordance with policy CTY8 of policy statement 21. | Robert M Martin Arch. Design, Rathmourne 17 Tullyhenan Road Banbridge BT32 4EY | Mr Trevor Bell, 18 Moygannon Road Donaghcloney Craigavon BT66 7NB | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to Paragraph 4.11 and 4.12 of the SPPS on the grounds that due to the close proximity of the application site to an established dog kennel business, that the proposal would fail to safeguard an acceptable living environment for the prospective residents of the proposed dwelling by reason of noise, light and odour. | 03/06/2021 | 10/06/2021 |
| LA08/2021/0190/O | Land immediately south of 25 Whitehill Road Banbridge Down BT32 3TS | Site for 2 dwellings at a cluster. | Mr John Coulter, 26 Whitehill Road Banbridge BT32 3TS | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY 2a of Planning Policy Statement 21, New Dwellings in Existing Clusters on the grounds that the proposed development fails to comply with criterion 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Policy CTY 2a. 3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside. | 27/05/2021 | 04/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2020/0716/RM | 50m east of No.44 Brackagh Moss Road Portadown Armagh BT62 3RG | Proposed erection of dwelling and garage. | J Richardson, 15 Beresford Hill Dromore BT25 1HQ | Mr Montgomery, 44 Brackagh Moss Road Portadown BT62 3RG | Approval (Objections received) | 27/05/2021 | 04/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2020/0018/F | Lands associated with and immediately to the rear (northeast) of 39 Derrymacash Road Lurgan BT66 6LG | Erection of garden store. | Paul McKernan, 25 Keady Road Armagh BT60 4AA | Mr Brendan Coleman, 39 Derrymacash Road Lurgan BT66 6LG | Approval (Objections received) | 27/05/2021 | 04/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2019/1446/F | 13 Richmond Drive Tandragee Co. Armagh BT62 2JJ | Single storey rear extension to enlarge kitchen, single storey side extension to provide ground floor store and conversion of existing garage to provide additional bedroom. | Office 30 Architects 27 Mahon Court Portadown BT62 3GE | Mr Paul Edwards 13 Richmond Drive Tandragee BT62 2JJ | Approval (Objections received) | 27/05/2021 | 04/06/2021 | |
| LA08/2019/0542/F | Lands between 42 and 48 Bleary Road Portadown BT63 5NE | Proposed infill site for dwelling, garage and associated site works - change of house type. | McAdam Stewart Architects, Banbridge Enterprise Centre Scarva Road Banbridge BT32 3QD | Mr & Mrs S Gorman, 46 Ballynagarrick Road Portadown BT63 5NR | Approval (Objections received) | 13/05/2021 | 20/05/2021 | |
| LA08/2020/0830/O | Land between No. 34 and 38 Monree Road Donaghcloney BT66 7LZ | Proposed site for new dwelling and garage (infill opportunity). (Renewal of existing outline planning approval). | P.S Design, 9 Drumview Road Lisburn BT27 6YF | Judith McDowell, 15 New Line Waringstown BT66 7RY | Approval (Objections received) | 13/05/2021 | 20/05/2021 | |
| LA08/2018/1268/F | Upon lands adjacent to and north of No. 9 Umgola Road Drumarg Or Downs Co Armagh N.Ireland to lands adjacent to and South-West of No. 3 Umgola Road Drumarg Or Downs Co Armagh N.Ireland BT60 4DJ | Proposed erection of residential housing development consisting of 19 No. dwellings (14 No. Semi-detached & 5 No. Detached dwellings), including associated site works and proposed landscaping scheme. | Blackgate Property Developments Ltd Mourne House 41-43 Downshire Road Newry BT34 1EE | Riverglade Developments Ltd Chez Nous 32 Killylea Road Armagh BT60 4AN | Approval (Objections received) | 13/05/2021 | 20/05/2021 | |
| LA08/2019/0127/O | Lands 65m South East of 65 Bessbrook Road Loughgilly Armagh BT60 2DD | Site for replacement of redundant non-residential building with single dwelling. | Armagh Design 63 Glen Mhacha Armagh BT61 8AF | Mr Ciaran Ward 42 Bessbrook Road Loughgilly Armagh BT60 2DD | Refusal | 1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 3 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal would bring significant environmental benefits, and would result in demonstrable landscape, heritage, access or amenity benefits 3. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed dwelling is a prominent feature in the landscape and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the building to integrate into the landscape. 4. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed dwelling is unduly prominent in the landscape. 5. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy FLD 5 `Development in Proximity to Reservoirs' of Planning Policy Statement 15 `Planning and Flood Risk' in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal would not be adversely impacted by flood inundation from Shaws Lake Reservoir. 6. The proposal is contrary to paragraph 4.12 Safeguarding Residential and Work Environs of the SPPS, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal would not be adversely impacted by contaminated land. | 13/05/2021 | 20/05/2021 |