Home Resident Planning Applications (Resident) Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Pursuant to the Council’s published Scheme of Delegation, the applications set out in the Delegated List below are now the subject of a recommendation by a Planning Officer. Applicants and agents who have any queries regarding a recommendation contained on this list should contact the planning officer dealing with the application. Please note that a Councillor can request that an application is removed from the Delegated List and referred to the Planning and Regulatory Services Committee at any stage prior to 5pm on the date noted in the table below provided a sound planning reason is given.

ALL CALL IN REQUESTS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO EMAIL ADDRESS .   ALL REQUESTS SHOULD BE TITLED ‘CALL IN REQUEST’

Lists of delegated planning applications can be viewed in the table below.

  • You can use the search box below to find an application, try searching by: Application number, postcode or first line of address.
  • If the green “+” icon is visible click on it to reveal hidden columns.

Reference NumberLocationProposalAgent Name & AddressApplicant Name & AddressRecommendationReason for Refusal (Where applicable)Date Delegate List IssuedDeadline for Call in (applies to elected members only) 5pm on
LA08/2020/1053/FAdjacent and north east of Kernan Shops
77 Lurgan Road
Portadown
BT63 5QR
Retention of existing steelwork shed associated with the filling of oil fuel lorrysML Design & Management 11 Richmond Chase
Mullavilly
Tandragee
BT62 2NP
Thompson Fuels Ltd 49 Market Street
Tandragee

Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy PED 1 of Planning Policy Statement 4, Planning and Economic Development in that the site of the development it is not located within an area specifically allocated for such purposes in a development plan nor that it is an existing or proposed industrial/employment area where it has been demonstrated that the proposal is compatible with the predominant industrial/employment use and has not been demonstrated that the proposal is determined to be acceptable on the basis of its own merits and it is not considered to be compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and PED 9 of Planning Policy Statement 4, Planning and Economic Development in that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that:
- The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses;
- The proposal will not harm the amenities of nearby residents;
- The proposal does not create a noise nuisance; and
- There are satisfactory measures to assist integration into the landscape. 3. The proposal is contrary to paragraphs 4.11 and 4.12 and Annex A of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement in that it has not been demonstrated that there would be no unacceptable adverse impacts on residential amenity by reason of noise, design, visual intrusion, loss of light and overshadowing and general nuisance.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2021/0138/FImmediately South of
Culowen Housing Scheme
Benburb Street
Blackwatertown
BT71 7GA
Section 54 application for variation of Condition 8 of Planning Application LA08/2016/0451/F (housing development comprising 10 semi-detached dwellings and 4 maisonettes).
Variation of condition 8 relates to maintenance and management of open space and amenity areas - submission of revised Landscape Management Plan.
Colm Donaghy Chartered Architect 43 Dungannon Street
Moy
BT71 7SH
P D Construction 30 Dungannon Road
Moy
BT71 7SW
RefusalThe proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Planning Policy Statement 8 Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation (PPS 8) Policy OS 1, on the grounds that the proposed development would result in the loss of an area of existing open space and it has not been clearly shown that its redevelopment will bring substantial community benefits which decisively outweigh the loss of the open space. 10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/0018/FLands associated with and immediately to the rear (northeast) of 39 Derrymacash Road
Lurgan
BT66 6LG
Erection of garden store.Paul McKernan, 25 Keady Road
Armagh
BT60 4AA
Mr Brendan Coleman, 39 Derrymacash Road
Lurgan
BT66 6LG
Approval (Objections received)10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2021/0123/OSite between no.6 and no.12 Blackskull Road
Dromore
Down
BT25 1JL
Site for proposed infill dwelling.Pepper Architects 48 Kinallen Road
Dromara
Dromore
BT25 2NW
Alistair Wilson 51 Blackskull Road
Dromore
BT25 1JN
Approval (Objections received)10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2021/0134/FApproximately 20m South East of 6 Culowen Quay
Blackwatertown
BT71 7FP
Erection of dwelling (2 bed)Colm Donaghy Chartered Architect 43 Dungannon Street
Moy
BT71 7SH
P D Construction 30 Dungannon Road
Moy
BT71 7SW
Refusal1.The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Planning Policy Statement 8 Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation (PPS 8) Policy OS 1, on the grounds that the proposed development would result in the loss of an area of existing open space and it has not been clearly shown that its redevelopment will bring substantial community benefits which decisively outweigh the loss of the open space. 2.The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy QD 1 (criteria a·& c) of Planning Policy Statement 7 (PPS 7): Quality Residential Environments and Criterion (b) of Policy LC 1 of the Addendum to PPS 7 Safeguarding the Character of Established Residential Areas, on the grounds that the proposed development fails to respect the surrounding context and the established pattern of development displayed in the surrounding area and would therefore be detrimental to the character and appearance of the general development. Adequate provision has not been provided for private open space as an integral part of the development.10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2021/0123/OSite between no.6 and no.12 Blackskull Road
Dromore
Down
BT25 1JL
Site for proposed infill dwelling.Pepper Architects, 48 Kinallen Road
Dromara
Dromore
BT25 2NW
Alistair Wilson, 51 Blackskull Road
Dromore
BT25 1JN
Refusal 1. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the site is not considered to be a small gap and would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Blackskull Road.
3. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the buildings would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings, would, if permitted not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in that area create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
4. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed site lacks long established natural boundaries and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the buildings to integrate into the landscape.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/0901/FLands 60m north and 100m north-east of 117 Drummanmore Road
Armagh
BT61 8RN
Conversion of existing farm buildings to shop / hire outlet with associated office and proposed erection of 6no. self catering studio units with rigid decking and associated site works.Weir + Weir Architects Ltd Studio 5
Millennium Court
William Street
Portadown
BT62 3NX
Mr M.J & J.R Scott 11 Annacramp Road
Armagh
BT61 8ES
Approval (Objections received)10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/1196/FOutside 19 Market Street
Lurgan
Armagh
BT66 6AR
The proposal is to site the TVM within the footway, in-line with existing street furniture and a minimum of 450mm from the kerb edge. The location and elevations are detailed on application drawings TL/PA01/ABC04, TL/PA01/ABC05 and TL/PA01/ABC06. The TVM has an associated shelter to protect customers using the device and an ancillary enclosure (feeder pillar) for provision of power, data communications and CCTV. The TVM requires fixing over a sound level base in the form of a poured concrete foundation. Translink NI Ticketing, 22 Great Victoria Street
Belfast
BT2 7LX
Approval (Objections received)10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2019/0763/F50m south east of 102a
Ballynamony Road
Lurgan
BT66 6LD
Erection of 1 No. dwelling and associated site works. (Revised Proposal).Uel Weir 3 Church Street
Portadown
BT62 3EU
Marc Fegan 102a Ballynamoney Road
Lurgan
BT66 6LD
Approval (Objections received)10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/0192/FApproximately 50 metres North West of 47 Ballymacanallen Road
Gilford
BT63 6AE
Erection of an infill dwelling, a garden shed and construction of a new entrance. Paul Monaghan CA Ltd, 53 Malone Road
Belfast
BT9 6RY
Paul Monaghan CA Ltd, 53 Malone Road
Belfast
BT9 6RY
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy FLD 1 of Revised PPS15 as the development lies within the fluvial flood plain where development is not permitted and as the applicant has not demonstrated that the proposal constitutes an exception to the policy.

2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy FLD2 of PPS15 as a minimum 5m working strip has not been shown on the drawings along the watercourse to facilitate future maintenance by Rivers Agency.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2021/0073/OLands 85m south east of no. 44 Lower Castlevennon Road
Katesbridge
BT32 5QN
Proposed erection of infill dwelling and garage2Plan NI, 47 Lough Fea Road
Cookstown
BT80 9QL
Hugh Higgins, 44 Lower Castlevennon Road
Katesbridge
BT32 5QN
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Lower Castlevennon Road.

3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing and approved buildings and would, if permitted create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to further erode the rural character of the countryside.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2021/0046/OLands 35m south east of no. 44 Lower Castlevennon Road
Katesbridge
BT32 5QN
Proposed erection of infill dwelling and garage.2Plan NI, 47 Lough Fea Road
Cookstown
BT80 9QL
Mr Hugh Higgins, 44 Lower Castlevennon Road
Katesbridge
BT32 5QN
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along Lower Castlevennon Road.

3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing and approved buildings and would, if permitted create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to further erode the rural character of the countryside.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/1539/O40m South East of no.5 Edenderry Road
Scarva
BT63 6NT
Proposed site for the erection of dwelling and garage in accordance with CTY8 of PPS21.Sharon Johnston, 67b Plantation Road
Portadown
BT63 5NH
Mr & Mrs Richard Clements, 9 Edenderry Road
Scarva
BT63 6NT
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the addition of ribbon development along Edenderry Road.

3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would add to a ribbon of development and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.

4. The proposal is contrary to Revised Planning Policy Statement 15 'Planning and Flood Risk' Policy FLD3 as it has not been demonstrated by way of a Drainage Assessment that adequate measures will be put in place to ensure that surface water runoff from the development will not adversely impact upon other development.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/1532/O50m North of no.9 Edenderry Road
Scarva
BT63 6NT
Proposed site for the erection of dwelling and garage in accordance with CTY8 of PPS21Sharon Johnston, 67b Plantation Road
Portadown
BT63 5NH
Mr & Mrs Richard Clements, 9 Edenderry Road
Scarva
BT63 6NT
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted, result in the addition of ribbon development along Edenderry Road.

3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the building would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would add to a ribbon of development and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.

4. The proposal is contrary to Revised Planning Policy Statement 15 'Planning and Flood Risk' Policy FLD3 as it has not been demonstrated by way of a Drainage Assessment that adequate measures will be put in place to ensure that surface water runoff from the development will not adversely impact upon other development.
10/06/202117/06/2021
LA08/2020/0916/FBetween 29 and 31 Cranny Lane
Portadown
BT63 5SW
Proposed erection of 2no. dwellings with garages.T.J Dreaning 135 Banbridge Road
Donaghcloney
BT66 7PJ
Mrs K & Mr R McMorran 25 Cranny Lane
Portadown
BT63 5SW
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement (SPPS) and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that while it is considered to be an exception as a small gap within a substantial and built up frontage, the proposal for two dwellings does not respect the existing development pattern along the frontage in terms of size, scale, siting and plot size. 3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposal for two dwellings and their garages would be suburban in character and inappropriate in this locality and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape. 4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that: the dwellings would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing and approved buildings and would not respect the traditional pattern of settlement exhibited in that area and would therefore result in a detrimental change to further erode the rural character of the countryside. 03/06/202110/06/2021
LA08/2020/0897/OAdjacent to and west of 14 Uppertown Road
Katesbridge
Banbridge
Down
Proposed site for infill dwelling.H D Design, 3 Bannview Road
Banbridge
BT32 3RL
Seamus Curran, 30 Carrigart
Craigavon
Approval (Objections received)03/06/202110/06/2021
LA08/2020/1060/OBetween numbers 15 and 19 Ballydugan Road
Ballydugan
Portadown
BT63 5NL
Proposed 2no. dwellings on infill site in accordance with policy CTY8 of policy statement 21.Robert M Martin Arch. Design, Rathmourne
17 Tullyhenan Road
Banbridge
BT32 4EY
Mr Trevor Bell, 18 Moygannon Road
Donaghcloney
Craigavon
BT66 7NB
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to Paragraph 4.11 and 4.12 of the SPPS on the grounds that due to the close proximity of the application site to an established dog kennel business, that the proposal would fail to safeguard an acceptable living environment for the prospective residents of the proposed dwelling by reason of noise, light and odour.03/06/202110/06/2021
LA08/2021/0190/OLand immediately south of 25 Whitehill Road
Banbridge
Down
BT32 3TS
Site for 2 dwellings at a cluster.Mr John Coulter, 26 Whitehill Road
Banbridge
BT32 3TS
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY 2a of Planning Policy Statement 21, New Dwellings in Existing Clusters on the grounds that the proposed development fails to comply with criterion 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Policy CTY 2a.

3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted result in a suburban style build-up of development when viewed with existing buildings and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
27/05/202104/06/2021
LA08/2020/0716/RM50m east of No.44 Brackagh Moss Road
Portadown
Armagh
BT62 3RG
Proposed erection of dwelling and garage.J Richardson, 15 Beresford Hill
Dromore
BT25 1HQ
Mr Montgomery, 44 Brackagh Moss Road
Portadown
BT62 3RG
Approval (Objections received)27/05/202104/06/2021
LA08/2020/0018/FLands associated with and immediately to the rear (northeast) of 39 Derrymacash Road
Lurgan
BT66 6LG
Erection of garden store.Paul McKernan, 25 Keady Road
Armagh
BT60 4AA
Mr Brendan Coleman, 39 Derrymacash Road
Lurgan
BT66 6LG
Approval (Objections received)27/05/202104/06/2021
LA08/2019/1446/F13 Richmond Drive
Tandragee
Co. Armagh
BT62 2JJ
Single storey rear extension to enlarge kitchen, single storey side extension to provide ground floor store and conversion of existing garage to provide additional bedroom.Office 30 Architects
27 Mahon Court
Portadown
BT62 3GE
Mr Paul Edwards
13 Richmond Drive
Tandragee
BT62 2JJ
Approval (Objections received)27/05/202104/06/2021
LA08/2019/0542/FLands between 42 and 48 Bleary Road
Portadown
BT63 5NE
Proposed infill site for dwelling, garage and associated site works - change of house type.McAdam Stewart Architects, Banbridge Enterprise Centre
Scarva Road
Banbridge
BT32 3QD
Mr & Mrs S Gorman, 46 Ballynagarrick Road
Portadown
BT63 5NR
Approval (Objections received)13/05/202120/05/2021
LA08/2020/0830/OLand between No. 34 and 38 Monree Road
Donaghcloney
BT66 7LZ
Proposed site for new dwelling and garage (infill opportunity). (Renewal of existing outline planning approval).P.S Design, 9 Drumview Road
Lisburn
BT27 6YF
Judith McDowell, 15 New Line
Waringstown
BT66 7RY
Approval (Objections received)13/05/202120/05/2021
LA08/2018/1268/FUpon lands adjacent to and north of No. 9 Umgola Road
Drumarg Or Downs
Co Armagh
N.Ireland to lands adjacent to and South-West of No. 3 Umgola Road
Drumarg Or Downs
Co Armagh
N.Ireland
BT60 4DJ
Proposed erection of residential housing development consisting of 19 No. dwellings (14 No. Semi-detached & 5 No. Detached dwellings), including associated site works and proposed landscaping scheme.Blackgate Property Developments Ltd Mourne House
41-43 Downshire Road
Newry
BT34 1EE
Riverglade Developments Ltd Chez Nous
32 Killylea Road
Armagh
BT60 4AN
Approval (Objections received)13/05/202120/05/2021
LA08/2019/0127/OLands 65m South East of 65 Bessbrook Road
Loughgilly
Armagh
BT60 2DD
Site for replacement of redundant non-residential building with single dwelling.Armagh Design
63 Glen Mhacha
Armagh
BT61 8AF
Mr Ciaran Ward
42 Bessbrook Road
Loughgilly
Armagh
BT60 2DD
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 3 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal would bring significant environmental benefits, and would result in demonstrable landscape, heritage, access or amenity benefits

3. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed dwelling is a prominent feature in the landscape and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the building to integrate into the landscape.

4. The proposal is contrary to Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposed dwelling is unduly prominent in the landscape.

5. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy FLD 5 `Development in Proximity to Reservoirs' of Planning Policy Statement 15 `Planning and Flood Risk' in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal would not be adversely impacted by flood inundation from Shaw’s Lake Reservoir.

6. The proposal is contrary to paragraph 4.12 ‘Safeguarding Residential and Work Environs’ of the SPPS, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal would not be adversely impacted by contaminated land.
13/05/202120/05/2021