Home Resident Planning Applications (Resident) Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Pursuant to the Council’s published Scheme of Delegation, the applications set out in the Delegated List below are now the subject of a recommendation by a Planning Officer. Applicants and agents who have any queries regarding a recommendation contained on this list should contact the planning officer dealing with the application. Please note that a Councillor can request that an application is removed from the Delegated List and referred to the Planning and Regulatory Services Committee at any stage prior to 5pm on the date noted in the table below provided a sound planning reason is given.

ALL CALL IN REQUESTS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO EMAIL ADDRESS .   ALL REQUESTS SHOULD BE TITLED ‘CALL IN REQUEST’

The new IT System for Planning went live on 5th December 2022. Applicants, agents – and any third parties who may have an interest in a particular application –  are asked to note that under the new IT System the functionality of the system has changed and language/terminology used on the system is different to that used under the old system.  In particular, it should be noted that unlike the old IT system, the status of an application on the new IT system will no longer change when the application has been placed on a delegated list.  Therefore, the onus is on applicants, agents and any third parties who may have an interest in a particular application to check the weekly delegated lists which appear on the Council’s website every Thursday evening to determine if an application has been placed on the delegated list at www.armaghbanbridgecraigavon.gov.uk/resident/planning-applications-residents/

Members of the public should also note there are a number of identified technical issues with the new system.  The performance of the system will continue  to be monitored as part of the normal service management arrangements and the Council is working closely with the stakeholders including the suppliers to resolve the outstanding issues.  Any issues of concern regarding the new planning IT system should be forwarded to

Lists of delegated planning applications can be viewed in the table below.

  • You can use the search box below to find an application, try searching by: Application number, postcode or first line of address.
  • If the green “+” icon is visible click on it to reveal hidden columns.

Reference NumberLocationProposalAgent Name & AddressApplicant Name & AddressRecommendationReason for Refusal (Where applicable)Date Delegate List IssuedDeadline for Call in (applies to elected members only) 5pm on
LA08/2021/1504/FLands immediately to the south of 12 Tanvally Road Annaclone and lands immediately to the north and east of 75 Ardbrin Road Annaclone.Proposed erection of housing development with 7 no. dwellings (3 sets of semi-detached dwellings and 1 detached dwelling and garage).Peadar O'Dowd Pod Architecture 137 Plantation Rd Ballydougan Craigavon BT63 5NNMr John Loy 13 Tanvally Road
Annaclone
Banbridge
BT32 5LN
Approval (Objections received)25/07/202401/08/2024
LA08/2024/0602/F20 Oakleigh Heights, Lurgan BT67 9BYConversion of existing detached garage to utlity area and erection of extension to connect to the dwelling. GT Building Design 6 Generals Walk
Donaghadee
Newtownards
BT21 0HT
Ruth Devlin 20 Oakleigh Heights
Lurgan
BT67 9BY
Approval (Objections received)25/07/202401/08/2024
LA08/2024/0211/RM11 Derrymore Road, Gawleys Gate, Lurgan, BT67 0BWErection of replacement dwelling and detached double garage and carport and associated site worksDavid Haire Architecture 25A Lower Toberhewny Lane
Lurgan
BT66 8SX
Rachael Gowdy 3 Derryhirk Road
Aghagallon
BT67 0BD
Approval (Objections received)25/07/202401/08/2024
LA08/2023/2515/OAdjacent to and West of 70 Bannview Road,
Banbridge
Proposed site for dwelling with entrance drive and associated site works.H.D Design 3 Bannview Road
Banbridge
BT32 3RL
Helen Lavery 29 Newry Road
Banbridge
BT32 3HP
Approval (Objections received)18/07/202425/07/2024
LA08/2024/0359/OLand immediately adjacent and 60m North west of 49 Artabrackagh Road, between 41 + 49 Artabrackagh Road Portadown BT62 3SQSite for an infill dwellingDavid Maxwell David Maxwell Architext Ltd 12 Ballyblaugh Road
Newry
BT34 1RR
Tony Clarke 41 Horseshoe Lane
Portadown
BT62 3RS
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to The Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to The Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal does not constitute a small gap sufficient only to accommodate up to a maximum of two houses within an otherwise substantial and continuously built-up frontage, and would, if permitted, result in the loss of an important visual break in built development and the creation of ribbon development along Artabrackagh Road. 3. The proposal is contrary to The Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and policy CTY 14 criteria (a), (b), (d) and (e) of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the development would, if permitted, be unduly prominent in the landscape, result in a suburban style buildup of development when viewed with existing buildings, create a ribbon of development and the impact of ancillary works would damage rural character which would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
4. The proposal is contrary to The Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and policy CTY 13 criteria (a), (b) and (f) of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the development would, if permitted, result in prominent features in the landscape, the site would be unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the building to integrate into the landscape, would fail to blend with the landform and therefore would fail to integrate into this area of countryside.
5. The proposed development is contrary to Annex A and Paragraphs 4.11, 4.12 and 5.72 of the SPPS and Policy CTY 1 and CTY 8 of PPS 21 on the grounds that due to the close proximity of the application site to agricultural buildings, the proposal would fail to provide an acceptable living environment for the prospective residents of the proposed dwelling by reason of odour, dust, noise and insects.
18/07/202425/07/2024
LA08/2023/3046/F27 and 29 Lough Road Lower, Lurgan on lands opposite & East and north east of 3-21 Lough Road Lower, LurganErection of 2 No Dwellings & Domestic Garages for family members of the travelling community to meet policy HS3 (amended) 'travellers accommodation'McKeown & Shields Assoc. Ltd 1 Annagher Road
Coalisland
BT71 4NE
William & Joseph Gentle 38 Ulster Street
Lurgan
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Planning Policy Statement 12: Housing in Settlements HS 3 (Amended) - Travellers Accommodation, in that there has been no demonstrated need for the proposed development.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 5 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there has been no information submitted by a registered Housing Association to demonstrate a need for the development.
3. The proposal is contrary to The Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the site lacks established boundaries required to provide a suitable degree of enclosure to enable two dwellings to visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement (SPPS) and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that two dwellings would if permitted result in an unduly prominent feature in the landscape and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character and add to build up in the countryside.
5. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy NH 2 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2, Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the development will not harm European or National Protected Species or natural heritage features worthy of protection.
04/07/202411/07/2024
LA08/2023/2620/FSite immediately adjacent to and north of 211 Tandragee Road, Portadown, BT62 3RAProposed erection of single storey detached dwelling and garage and associated siteworks (Amended Plans)MCADAM STEWART ARCHITECTS ENTERPRISE CENTRE
SCARVA ROAD
BANBRIDGE
BT323QD
D GILMORE DEVLEOPMENTS LTD 28 DROMORE ROAD
LURGAN
BT66 7LD
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement, HOU 2 of the CAP 2010 and Policy QD1 (Criteria h) of Planning Policy Statement 7 Quality Residential Development and Policy LC1 of PPS 7 (Addendum) in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal will create a quality and sustainable residential environment.

2. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement in that the proposed development would, if permitted, harm the living conditions of residents in No.90 The Fairways by reason of overlooking and consequent lack of privacy.

3. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2, Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the development will not result in the unacceptable adverse impact on, or damage to known priority species, rare of threatened native species or features of natural heritage importance.

4. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy NH 2 and NH 53 of Planning Policy Statement 2, Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the development will not harm European or National Protected Species.
04/07/202711/07/2024
LA08/2023/3137/F14 Heatherbank, Dromara, Co Down, BT25 2BARetention of detached garage, boundary walls and gate and extension to curtilage (Amended Plan)Brian Russell 48 Lismurn Park Ahoghill BT42 1JWMrs Knox 14 Heatherbank Kinallen BT25 2BAApproval (Objections received)04/07/202711/07/2024
LA08/2024/0325/OLands immediately to and adjoining the western boundary of No.34 Old Bann Road, and 45m south of 32A Old Bann Road Ballynabragget Donaghcloney, Craigavon BT66 7PWSite for dwelling and garageT.J. Dreaning 135 Banbridge Road
Donaghcloney
Craigavon
BT66 7PJ
Jonathan Duff 32 Old Bann Road
Donaghcloney
Craigavon
BT67 7PW
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policies CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement (SPPS) and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the site does not have a frontage onto the Old Bann Road, Donaghcloney.
04/07/202411/07/2024
LA08/2024/0054/O55 Vicarage Road
Portadown
BT62 4HF
Site for a storey and a half replacement dwelling and garage (proposed 6.5m ridge height to dwelling)Tom Stephenson Architect
The Studio
74a Gilford Road
Portadown
BT63 5EG
David Hewitt
Mullroy
43 Clonroot Road
Portadown
BT62 4HG
Approval (Objections received)04/07/202411/07/2024
LA08/2024/0331/RMSite between No.150 Desart Lane and Glen Court
Armagh
BT61 8AS
Erection of 2no. two-storey detached dwellings with a detached single garage for house type 1Ballymullan Architect (BMA) Ltd.
50 Ballymullan Road
Lisburn
SOS Sales Ltd.
c/o James Scalon
4 Portadown Road
Armagh
BT61 9EE
Approval (Objections received)04/07/202411/07/2024
LA08/2023/3139/OImmediately adjacent and to the north of 129 Gilford Road, Lurgan (site of 'Free Grace Hall' a previous place of religious assembly).Site for dwelling and garageHPA Architecture Ltd Suite 4 The Exchange
Goban Street
PORTADOWN
BT63 5AG
Samuel Davison T D Gibson & Co
Montrose House
17-21 Church Street
PORTADOWN
BT62 3LN
Approval (Objections received)27/06/202404/07/2024
LA08/2024/0086/FLands immediately north west of 6 Drummiller Lane, Drummiller, ScarvaErection of detached dwelling with attached garage and associated hard and soft landscapingThe Designworks Studio, 21 Annagora Road
Portadown
BT62 4JE
Stephen and Isla Brown, 46 Enniscrone Park
Portadown
BT63 5DQ
Approval (Objections received)27/06/202404/07/2024
LA08/2023/2668/O60 metres North and adjacent to No 4 Kernan Road, Kernan, Gilford, Co Down, BT63 6BUSite for single dwelling based on infill Warnock Consulting, 17 Rathfriland Street
Banbridge
BT32 3LB
Mr Eamon McCartan, 33 Drumaran Road
Kernan
Gilford
BT63 6BU
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposal if permitted, would create a ribbon of development along the Kernan Road.

3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the dwelling would, if permitted, result in a suburban style build-up of development, create a ribbon of development, and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.

4. Having notified the agent under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further details by way of an accurate biodiversity checklist is required to allow the Council to determine the application to ensure the proposal meets with the requirements of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland; Policies NH 2, NH 4 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2 Natural Heritage and having not received this information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.

5. Having notified the agent under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further information is required by Environmental Health by way of a noise impact assessment to allow the Council to determine the application and having not received sufficient information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.
27/06/202404/07/2024
LA08/2023/2985/FLands located 70 metres north of no. 129 Blackskull Road, Dromore, BT25 1JWErection of dwelling, garage and all associated site works (in substitution to that previously approved under LA08/2018/0160/F) Andy Stephens Matrix Planning Consultancy Saba Park
14 Balloo Avenue
Bangor
BT19 7QT
Ricardo Manso 17 Church Meadows
Dromore
BT25 1LZ
Refusal 1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. Having notified the agent under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further details by way of an accurate biodiversity checklist and ecological statement (and any relevant surveys) is required to allow the Council to determine the application to ensure the proposal meets with the requirements of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland; Policies NH 2, NH 4 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2 Natural Heritage and having not received this information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/2167/FApprox. 85 metres north-west of 119 Battleford Road
Benburb
Armagh
BT61 8BS
Erection of agricultural shed for storage of grain, with associated hardstanding and site works, and alterations to existing vehicular accessMcAleenan Architects + Interior Design Ltd
5 Dobbin Street
Armagh
Rod Carmichael
119 Battleford Road
Armagh
BT61 8BS
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 12 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that: it has not been demonstrated that the farm business has been established for at least 6 years; it has not been demonstrated that it is necessary for the efficient use of the agricultural holding; its scale is not appropriate for its location; it would not visually integrate into the local landscape; it has not been demonstrated that it would not have an adverse impact on natural heritage; and it has not been demonstrated that there are no suitable existing buildings on the holding that can be used.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that: the proposed development would be a prominent feature in the landscape; the site lacks long established natural boundaries and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the building to integrate into the landscape; it relies primarily on the use of new landscaping for integration; it fails to blend with the landform; and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the development would, if permitted, be unduly prominent in the landscape, and add to a ribbon of development along Battleford Road, and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
5. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the development would, if permitted, add to a ribbon of development along Battleford Road.
6. The proposal is contrary to Paragraph 6.192 of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, and Policy NH 2 and Policy NH 5 of PPS 2: Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development is not likely to result in an unacceptable adverse impact on or damage to priority habitats and/or protected species.
20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/3017/F6 Brackenridge, Magheralin, Craigavon, BT67 0UEInstallation of velux window on roof and modification / replacement of existing gable window on southwest elevation (second floor) to include change to opaque glass and non-opening.Alina Holyst Alina Holyst Architects 11 Pine Valley
Rostrevor
Newry
BT34 3DE
Jarek Gudyma 6 Brackenridge
Craigavon
BT67 0UE
Approval (Objections received)20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/2584/OSouth and West of Cricket Club, Clare Road, Waringstown, CraigavonProposed residential housing and alterations to cricket club entranceT.J. Dreaning 135 Banbridge Road
Donaghcloney
Craigavon
BT66 7PJ
M H Harnett Banbridge Road
Waringstown
Craigavon
BT66 7QA
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy QD1 of PPS7: Quality Residential Environments criteria (a), (b), (c), (e), and (f) as it has not been demonstrated that the development respects the surrounding context and is appropriate to the character and topography of the site, that features of the archaeological heritage and landscape features are identified, protected and integrated in a suitable manner into the overall design and layout of the development, that adequate provision is made for private open space and that appropriate access and parking can be provided for the proposal.
2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policies NH2 and NH5 of PPS2:Natural Heritage as it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is not likely to harm a European protected species or that the proposal is not likely to result in an unacceptable adverse impact on Habitats, Species or Features of Natural Heritage Importance.
3. The proposal is contrary to paragraphs 6.191- 6.192 of the SPPS and policy NH5 of PPS2: Natural Heritage as it would result in a threat to the continued well being of existing trees which are subject of a Tree Preservation Order
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy LC1 of PPS7 (Addendum) – Safeguarding the Character of Established Residential Areas as it has not been demonstrated that the proposed pattern of development is in keeping with the overall character and environmental quality of the established residential area or that the density is not significantly higher than that found in the established residential area;
5. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policies AMP1, AMP2 and AMP 7 of PPS3: Access, Movement and Parking as it has not been demonstrated that the proposal provides for an accessible environment for everyone and an appropriate access and parking arrangement.
6. The proposed development is contrary to paragraphs 6.16-6.17 of the SPPS and Policy BH 6 of PPS 6 as it will adversely change the character, integrity and original design intent of this part of the designed landscape of Waringstown House, Historic Park, Garden and Demesne.
7. The proposal is contrary to paragraph 6.8, of the SPPS and Policy BH 1 of PPS6: Planning, Archaeology and the Built Heritage as the site is immediately adjacent to and may contain part of the scheduled area of a Scheduled Historic Monument protected under the provisions of the Historic Monuments and Archaeological Objects (NI) Order 1995 and the proposal may involve direct archaeological impacts in breach of the Historic Monuments and Archaeological Objects (NI) Order 1995. The proposal will also represent an adverse change to the existing character and integrity of the monument’s setting.
8. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy FLD3 of PPS15 as it has not been demonstrated by way of a drainage assessment that adequate measures will be put in place so as to effectively mitigate the flood risk to the proposed development and from the development elsewhere.
20/06/202427/06/2024